<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From Wiki to WordPress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jbreazeale.com/2010/02/15/from-wiki-to-wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jbreazeale.com/2010/02/15/from-wiki-to-wordpress/</link>
	<description>Plain talk about technology for small business owners.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:53:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: edaehnick</title>
		<link>http://jbreazeale.com/2010/02/15/from-wiki-to-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>edaehnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jbreazeale.com/blog/?p=914#comment-84</guid>
		<description>My experience with wikis is that only a small part of the intended user group actually uses them. I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s because the concept of a multi-user authored doc is foreign to many people, or that the wiki options are usually kind of ugly and kluge-y. I do think that WordPress for multiple users would have a much better shot at participation, especially if the interface - and final information display - look clean and nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experience with wikis is that only a small part of the intended user group actually uses them. I don&#39;t know if it&#39;s because the concept of a multi-user authored doc is foreign to many people, or that the wiki options are usually kind of ugly and kluge-y. I do think that WordPress for multiple users would have a much better shot at participation, especially if the interface &#8211; and final information display &#8211; look clean and nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
