The evolution of hubs – from Wes to Wordpress

by jbreazeale on February 10, 2010

Rusted Hub
Image by Thomas Hawk via Flickr

Anytime you’re trying to organize, coordinate, and communicate with more than two people over more than a few days, you’ll realize that relying on email (or Facebook, or Twitter) to carry the burden will drive all of you crazy. Someone’s going to miss a message, the “right” people won’t be cc’d or (worse) everyone will be cc’d. On every message. Good times.

After a few of these “I can manage the whole thing via email” disasters, hopefully you’ll start to realize that a centralized “hub” for your team / project / organization might just save your sanity.

A Brief History of Hubs

Then came the “quality” movement and its efforts to quantify and codify the information available from the Wes’s of the world. “Sure, you could go talk to Wes, but we can’t all talk to Ted at the same time, so let’s just write down what Wes said and then we can go back to that the next time we have a question.”

Note: This would have been a great time to buy stock in three-ring binder companies. Especially the really, really big three-ring binders.

And, just as everyone was becoming comfortable with their bookshelf o’ binders, along came the internet and widespread use of personal computers. In the (ultimately futile) quest to become paperless offices, documents were scanned into “document management systems”, we created our “shared drives” and uploaded files to our corporate “intranets” and suddenly all workers had access to all the information they needed, right?

Not quite.

Now, not only had the information been separated from its human hub (which could interpret context and apply judgment), we’d added more layers of bureaucracy and abstraction. A two-minute call to Wes had been replaced by “where’s that #!@* procedure on the intranet? … No, not *that* version, the *new* version…. What do you mean I have to send it to X to get it approved so that Y can post it? … Never mind, I’ll just find that email that A sent me, I think that was the current version…”

Ceramic unicorn

Unicorn (via ffffound)

So, if bureaucracy was the problem, then the solution must be self-service, right? Enter the wiki. Now everyone can create their own content and make it available to others who can then edit and improve and contribute and then, in the magical land of unicorns and rainbows, we’ll have a dynamic and robust source of institutional knowledge and tribal wisdom and we’ll all live happily ever after….

Well, I don’t know about you, but I haven’t seen too many unicorns lately.

The great wiki experiment has had some notable successes (um, Wikipedia anyone?), but outside the realm of technologists and large organizations (who have lots of those technologists), I think the usefulness of wikis has peaked. If I want to share information with my friends, I use Twitter or Facebook. If I’m working collaboratively, I can use Google Docs (or perhaps Google Wave), or a variety of 37signals products. And, if I’m going to organize, coordinate, and communicate with a specific group of people, I’m going to use Wordpress.

Coming soon: From Wiki to Wordpress (why we’re making the switch)

{ 1 comment }

Happy New Year!

by jbreazeale on January 6, 2010

2010 New Year's Greeting Card

Image by weblog244 via Flickr

So long, 2009! Don’t let the door hit you on the way out!

I don’t know about you, but 2009 was a rough year for me and many of my friends. Don’t get me wrong, I am very grateful that my family remained safe, healthy, and happy, that my hubby and I have (relatively) stable jobs to support us, that we have friends near and far to eat, drink, laugh, and cry with (and, more and more frequently, to have playdates with!), and that I’ve found such wonderful techie / startup /entrepreneurial / etc. communities to be involved with.

Now that I’ve finished the last of my 2009 holiday relaxing and recharging, I’m ready to get 2010 rolling!

Content coming soon (no, really!)

You  know how they say the best way to learn something is to teach it?

Well, starting this month I’ll be posting some of the “How-To” guides that I’ve created for my clients along with some of the lessons I’ve learned along the way.  This could include:

  • Do I need to have separate domain registration and hosting?
  • Why should I use Wordpress instead of my (host’s free) site builder?
  • Why do I need to buy hosting when I can use Wordpress.com for free?
  • Claiming and naming your Facebook page.
  • Why you should have a Twitter account, even if you aren’t sure that you’ll use it (a.k.a What’s that Twitter thing?)

What else would you like to see in 2010? What software jargon is buzzing around your office that you don’t understand but need/want to? Let me know!

{ 0 comments }

Inbound Marketing UniversityProfessor: Elyse Tager, Silicon Valley American Marketing Association (SVAMA)

Although the information presented in this session was valuable, I would have rather visited the LinkedIn Learning Center and/or the Facebook “About” page to learn more about these topics. Having someone try and walk me through basics and setup steps via PowerPoint is just painful for me. If it’s helpful to you, then maybe you’ll enjoy this one.

Some of the general themes that came out of Elyse’s presentation:

  • Know your objectives before engaging on any of these platforms – be a rifle, not a shotgun.
  • Each platform has it’s own culture and way of interacting; pay attention and participate appropriately.
  • Always be thinking about SEO/branding; be consistent in your profiles, use keywords effectively, create great content.

Things I didn’t know before:

  • LinkedIn: You can take a look at your “profile views” statistics to see who’s been looking at your personal (or company) profile. Although this information isn’t detailed, it does provide you with an idea of who’s interested in you and if your ideas are reaching their targets.
  • LinkedIn: Ask and answer questions to showcase your knowledge, expertise, and interests. People can rate your answer and elevate you to “Expert” status. Overuse of this ask/answer feature can look spammy, though.
  • LinkedIn: You can look for, recommend, or become a “Service Provider”.
  • LinkedIn and Facebook: Both have inexpensive options for advertising available on a CPM/CPC basis. (I’m guessing their inexpensive because they don’t work too well, but maybe that will change over time.) When you’re targeting your  Facebook ad you will get to see the size of your audience/potential reach of that ad.

Here’s Elyse’s presentation:

{ 0 comments }

Social Media and Building Community (IMU)

by jbreazeale on June 23, 2009

Inbound Marketing UniversityProfessor: Chris Brogan, New Marketing Labs

I didn’t make an actual count of Chris’ mentions/celebrations of other people’s ideas, products, and successes, but based on my rough notes I think he was getting pretty close to his oft stated Twitter goal of 15:1 (their stuff:your stuff) and he also managed to spread these examples across industries and businesses, large and small.

Chris’ knowledge, expertise, and passion around using social tools to build communities and his ability to translate this into clear, human examples have made him a leader in the field and I would strongly encourage you to take a look at his presentation (below) to see these ideas presented in his words (and then, of course, subscribe to his newsletter and blog for ongoing social media community goodness!) In the meantime, here are a few of the highlights from his IMU presentation:

  • It’s not about you, so always be humble.
  • Create content that your community wants (and/or needs). Hint: This is probably not what you think it is and it’s almost definitely not a sales-y pitch about your new product.
  • Be where your community members are – the platform (Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo! Groups) doesn’t matter, go where the people are, go where the participation is happening.
  • Always acknowledge your community members, celebrate their successes, and equip them to handle their challenges.
  • Although return on investment (ROI) is important and should be measured, also consider the “return on influence” (ROI) as well.

And some nitty-gritty details from the Q&A:

Should you separate personal and professional identities when interacting with communities? It depends. Generally, it’s easier and more authentic to blend the two (while being mindful of what you’re posting where.)

How many connections are too many? It depends. Chris uses CRM tools to manage his numerous connections, but that may or may not work for your. (YMMV)

What listening tools should I use? There are lots, paid and free. Free tools are great starting points. Paid tools can help with automation, workflow management, and detailed analyses. It’s how you use the tools, not the tools themselves

Should I use my business name or my personal name on Twitter? It depends. For companies with multiple users,  the best option may be to do a combination of the two (@janeATcompany instead of @janedoe or @company.) This lets you know you’re talking to a real person, but also allows people to find you if they search on your company name.

I hope this summary was helpful! Don’t forget, I’m also adding all of the links and examples I run across in these presentations to my delicious.com page for IMU. Enjoy!

<a href=”http://www.inboundmarketing.com/university”><img src=”http://inboundmarketing.com/sites/default/files/imu_imu125×125.gif” height=”125″ width=”125″ border=”0″ alt=”Inbound Marketing University” /></a>

{ 2 comments }

Inbound Marketing UniversityIMU wrapped up with presentations on old-school email marketing campaigns and web analytics and both speakers managed to provide meaningful suggestions, tips and tricks for small, medium, and large businesses (B-to-B and B-to-C).  Here’s a summary:

Successful Email Marketing (CV301), Professor: Eric Groves, Constant Contact

Since his company is one of the most well-known providers of email marketing campaign software, I wasn’t too surprised to hear Eric Groves’ overwhelmingly positive spin on this form of inbound marketing. Presentation bias aside, his passion for the topic really shone through when he was providing us with examples from his daily life – keeping a box of Constant Contact brochures/booklets in the trunk of his car to hand out to business owners who he discovered weren’t building/maintaining a customer list or hadn’t considered the potential of a intentional outreach campaign to those customers, totally believeable. In his talk, he focused on three steps to getting started with email marketing:

1. Making Connections

It’s hard to market to your customers if you don’t know who they are, so the first step is to build a high quality list. To ensure that you have the right people, make sure you’re collecting information at every customer touchpoint – if someone has referred a customer to you, is that referrer in your list? if you’re talking with one person at a company, then two, then three, are all three in your list? To ensure you have the right information about those people, make sure you’re asking good questions – are they interested in product A or B or both? are you targeting your message based on their response?

Two more tips:

  • Ask for permission as well as contact information.
  • Clearly describe the frequency and content of the emails your client will receive.

2. Informing Your Audience

Content is king! Eric described “email nirvana” as when a folder is created in someone’s inbox just for your communications (assuming that this means they’ve deemed your content important enough to keep. I personally use Gmail’s filters/labels to move these items out of my inbox because they’re less important. What do you think?) I do agree that a good test for the content is – would I forward this to my friends?

Know your objective so you can know which tool to use and how to measure success. Are you trying to inform your audience? Try a newsletter with good informational content (more text than pictures), links back to your website, and a soft call to action. Are you looking to sell? Send a promotional message (more images, less text) that highlights the offers and drives traffic back to your site. (Eric’s stat: 50% of what’s purchased through a promotional email isn’t specifically metioned in the promotional email.) Are you trying to build a relationship with your customers? Provide content that’s valuable to them and give them lots of ways to give feedback (comments, polls, forward this links).

Also:

  • Although you want the email to match your company’s brand, don’t overdo the header with a big logo. Many people won’t see the image (especially if images turned off or if using some mobile devices), instead use text with your company’s name and put the logo at the bottom.
  • 80% of response to email communication happens within first 48 hours, so know your readers and check your email stats – if you can see when folks read your emails, base your timing on that.
  • “From” should be the name most recognizable to customers.  (If they know you, use your name. If they know your business, use that name.)

3. Growing Your Business

This part of the presentation was a very general overview of bounced / undeliverable emails, open rates, and click-through rates. If you’re really interested, I’d recommend finding more resources on the topic.

One last gem, from the Q & A session:

Q – “What do you do with all of those business cards you collect at a tradeshow/convention/event? Should you just add them to your list?”

A – A better method (than just adding them to your list) would be to go to your last campaign, use the “forward to friend” link and create a personalized message to that contact (“Great meeting you at the tradeshow. Thought you might like this. Thanks.) This allows you to follow up on the initial contact, but lets the recipient decide whether or not to subscribe.


Analyzing Inbound Marketing (AZ401), Professor: Marshall Sponder, Monster.com, Web Analytics Association for Social Media

Ok, this might have been a pretty dry topic for many, but parts of it were very appealing to my inner stats geek. And, since this was the last presentation, I found it interesting to compare the various presentation styles I’d seen throughout the week – the marketing guy was the most entertaining, the community guy was the most engaging, and the analytics guy was the most low-key. Overall, this session seemed like a decent overview of the topic, but perhaps due to the content, it’s hard to do only an hour long presentation.

Key takeaways:

  • Google Analytics is fine for most people and accomplishes a lot; if you need something else/more, there are plenty of services, at all price points, covering most markets, to help you.
  • Use non-traditional sources to analyze your traffic data – dig into the referral logs and do some data-mining, use tools like Twitter Grader or Facebook Grader to find influencers in the community, use delicious.com to find and analyze keyword data.

And to wrap it all up…

I am so grateful to all of the organizers, speakers, sponsors, and participants at the inaugural Inbound Marketing University – what a great resource (at an unbeatable price!) I’ll be brushing up this weekend on the two courses I missed in preparation for the exam on Monday and I’ll be posting reviews of the previous sessions as I work my way through my notes. Now, here’s my list of IMU bookmarks and the slides to the classes above. Enjoy!

{ 2 comments }